The new Darren Aronofsky / Parmaount blockbuster, Noah, has been met with very mixed reviews. As such it is a good example of the difficultly and necessity of engaging media with a Christian mind. Here is one review by David Instone-Brewer. Add your own comments and reviews and let’s have a conversation.
For once it is no hype to say this film has a canvas of Biblical proportions.
Though in today’s language you might compare it more accurately with Lord of the Rings. Look out for images akin to Isengard, fighting as impressive as Aragorn’s and creatures suspiciously similar to the Ents.
If you are wondering where all this fits into Genesis, be prepared to let your imagination soar. Storylines from the Book of Enoch, other Jewish myths and the director’s imagination supplement the Bible text. Together they create a compelling story and a surprise ending.
Charlton Heston famously defined an epic as a film that he starred in. He was wonderful at portraying strength with a smouldering anger. Russell Crowe is starting to fill his shoes, and is very suitable as Noah, because he can show the same strength though with an underlying sadness. In this film he also adds a convincing hint of madness, but I mustn’t give too much away.
It is unfair to ask “Is it accurate?” If it were, there would be only ten minutes of story plus lots more special effects. Actually, “special effects” is an understatement. Throughout the film everything is so real that I was glad it wasn’t in 3D.
The really 3D aspect of this film is in the characterisation. Noah and his sons are totally believable and the tensions with Ham flesh out the Biblical narrative convincingly. But the female roles carry the dramatic turning points, conveyed with Oscar-quality acting. They also get the best lines and appear to speak the director’s message.
Although the film takes liberties with the story of Noah, the essential message of Genesis is conveyed clearly and accurately. The story of Eden, the snake, temptation, the murder of Abel and subsequent decline of humanity is referred to frequently. The bigger picture of God’s plan to undo this damage is hinted at, but it would not be true to Genesis to state this clearly.
“How do we know God’s will?” is the unspoken question addressed by various characters throughout the film. How can Noah know what to do, and does he really understand God’s plan accurately? His dream informs him but also misleads him. His wife (who, as in the Bible, is nameless), says the goodness in our character comes from God so we should listen to it. Tubal-Cain, the violent self-appointed king, says God has left us to do whatever we want.
This film shouldn’t be seen as an accurate portrayal of the Bible, but can be treated as a thought-provoking way to explore the message of Genesis.
This review first appeared in the Tyndale House Newsletter.
- For a more thorough (i.e. plot spoiler), and more critical review of the movie see Creation Ministries where they make the interesting point that God is excluded as the main character – sovereign, good and speaking clearly – leaving Noah to fill that vacuum, and that while the depiction of evil is accurate, the conclusion is that humanity ultimately is good enough to be worth preserving.
- For a positive take on the evangelistic opportunity potential of the film and lots of accompanying resources see Damaris Media.
And another very helpful contribution on ‘Noah’ and how we engage film media from Darrell Bock: http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2014/04/07/hollywood-movies-and-the-bible-should-we-rewind-on-how-we-view/